Ackerman-Practicon
801 E. Charleston Road
Palo Alto, Ca. 94303
Phone (650) 965-1000
www.apcts.com
jpettegrew@apcts.com
Abstract
The next generation of High Density Data Center cooling systems must focus greater attention on the following two areas: the control of the in-room cooling systems, and enhanced communication between the hardware vendor, the end users, and the Engineer of Record. Cooling delivered automatically in response to the thermal needs of computer hardware will increase the utilization efficiency and overall operating efficiency of the cooling systems.
Summary:
High Density Data Center (HDDC) cooling systems and Class 1 clean rooms have one thing in common. Their success depends on the effective management and control of large volumes of air within their respective spaces. In clean rooms the objective is to remove particulate matter and in the HDDC it is the removal of heat. Reversing the air pattern and creating an upside down clean room offers a unique way to deliver high volumes of cooling to the data center floor from below. Ackerman-Practicon used this innovative approach recently in the design of the mechanical systems for the new Terascale Facility at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. The lower level of the building shell served a dual purpose. It was used to convey cooling to the data center located above and was also used for the installation of the mechanical and electrical support systems serving the data center.
The above is an example of a unique engineering approach that goes beyond the traditional design thinking for data center infrastructure. The increased demands being placed on HDDC cooling systems will require fresh design approaches and not merely the scaling up of past designs. The next generation of in-room HDDC cooling systems will be designed to accommodate the varying heat density applications with cooling provided automatically in response to the thermal needs of the computer hardware.
This discussion centers on the management and control of the in-room
air distribution systems with emphasis on the following design and design
process related areas:
The upward trend in the thermal densities of computer hardware, increased equipment compaction rates and a greater awareness of energy usage are all putting increased demands on the performance of data center cooling systems. Data center “hot spots,” which are becoming more prevalent, are the result of trying to meet the cooling requirements of today’s high heat density hardware with cooling system design philosophies that are more than 20 years old.
Data center cooling systems are designed, in general, to deliver uniform cooling over a specified area and do not address the variations in thermal densities that will ultimately occur within the data center. The more complex issue is the design of an in-room cooling system that is capable of reacting to equipment thermal footprints ranging from less than 100 watts/sf to over 2000 watts/sf. Temperature control is still mainly achieved by the manual manipulation of perforated floor tile in an effort to distribute the cooling. This will work to a degree when the initial computer hardware installation begins. However, as the equipment population of the room grows delivering cooling capacity to where it is needed will become impossible unless automatic control systems and cooling hardware capable of providing concentrated cooling are integrated into the design of the cooling systems. Design of the air management and control systems within the room becomes increasingly important as the range of heat densities throughout the room increases.
The basic data center cooling system, using air as the cooling medium,
can be divided into the following three major components:
In the past there has been a communication disconnect between the cooling system designer, the computer hardware vendor and the end user. It is not uncommon for the services of the Engineer of Record to end with the design of the basic cooling system infrastructure. When the equipment heat densities were lower this lack of communication between the various parties was less of an issue. Manual manipulation of supply air floor tiles provided a degree of temperature control. The cooling systems were more forgiving then and as a result the bad implementation habits noted above were established that continue today.
The design of the in-room air distribution and control systems needs to be approached like any other cooling design application. The Engineer of Record needs to work with hardware designers to define the cooling requirements necessary for optimum computer hardware performance. Equipment locations, heat dissipation rates, air flows of computer hardware, and recommended operating temperatures are all parameters that need to be accounted for to determine the final distribution of cooling within the room.
The design and control of the secondary air delivery systems will depend on the peak and range of thermal densities in the room. Options available include the standard perforated floor tile, floor grating, and packaged secondary cooling modules. When fitted with control dampers the floor supply air tiles are limited in capacity. Without control dampers high capacity supply air floor tiles will make it difficult to maintain plenum pressure.
The predictable and reliable performance of the in-room air distribution and control systems starts with a stable and reliable static pressure in the below floor supply air plenum. With a stable static pressure under the floor, the secondary air delivery systems can be designed to meet the thermal needs of the computer hardware. Without this stability the performance of the cooling systems will be unpredictable and unreliable. Changes in one part of the system will influence the performance in other areas.
The following concepts for implementing secondary air delivery devices
are offered for consideration. The design objective is to provide cooling
automatically in response to the thermal needs of the computer hardware
with minimal mixing of warm room air into the cooling air stream. The concepts
are directed to those applications using open racks or free standing servers
with density ranges given to describe the concept. With higher capacity
controllable devices, equipment cold aisles can be reduced and equipment
compaction rates increased. Final density ranges and the management and
control of air distribution within the room would need to be engineered
for specific applications.
Cooling systems for new facilities will continue to utilize air
as a cooling medium in the near term. Supply air temperatures need to be
adjusted downward to achieve the greatest amount of cooling per pound of
air delivered to the space. Variable flow fixed temperature supply air
systems will increase the utilization efficiency and operational efficiency
of the cooling systems. Developing new techniques for the management and
control of the air distribution systems will be essential to providing
a proper equipment operating environment. Utilizing a below floor supply
air plenum provides an efficient means to deliver large amounts of cooling
energy. It forms a big reservoir that can be tapped into as needed to address
the varying heat densities that will occur within the data center. The
height of the supply air plenum needs to be engineered for specific applications
and will depend on the design load of the room along with other physical
and operational parameters. It can range from a raised access floor within
a single story building to a full story of building height where it shares
space with mechanical and electrical equipment.
Successful cooling systems, for data centers of the future, will challenge current designs and design processes. Communication between hardware designers and cooling system designers will lead to cooling system designs that deliver cooling automatically in response to the thermal needs of the computer hardware. Control of the in-room cooling systems will increase the utilization efficiency and operating efficiency allowing owners to realize the full potential of their cooling system capital investment.
About the Author: James E. Pettegrew P.E. is a Mechanical Engineer with
the consulting firm of Ackerman-Practicon located in Palo Alto, Ca.